Extraditing Clare: A midsummer night’s dream?

Suaram adviser presents the long road ahead for Malaysian authorities as they attempt to extradite the owner and editor of the Sarawak Report.


By Kua Kia Soong

The Malaysian Police have announced that an arrest warrant has been obtained for Clare Rewcastle-Brown, the London-based founder of Sarawak Report (SR) who has been publishing exposes on the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal. Clare has been accused of colluding with others in a conspiracy to unseat Prime Minister Najib Razak. Her whistleblower site has published numerous incriminating documents on the troubled state investor.

Criminal Investigations Department (CID) director Mohmad Salleh has said the warrant, granted by a court here, is for offences under Sections 124B and 124I of the Penal Code and that that the police will proceed with the applications to place her on the Aseanapol wanted list as well as the Interpol red notice.

This stunt is basically ‘syok sendiri’ (self gratification) and an attempt to delude the public that Clare is somehow guilty of some heinous crime and that Her Majesty’s Government would obligingly allow her extradition to be tried in a Malaysian court. I am sure the wigs of British judges must be jiggling with insuppressible mirth when they heard this news.

How feasible is it to extradite Clare?

Malaysia falls under Category 2 in the UK’s Extradition Act. Under this law, requests from Category 2 states need decisions by both the Secretary of State and the courts.

First, an extradition request is made to the Secretary of State; the Secretary of State issues a certificate and sends a request to the court (if the request is valid) We do not know the caliber of British Secretaries of State these days under Conservative rule but such a request to extradite an investigative journalist would be summarily dumped by any minister worth his or her salt.

An extradition request would be required to, among other things, produce a certificate of the conviction and sentence with details of the conviction; evidence or information that justifies the issue of a warrant for arrest in the UK.

When a “valid” extradition request is made to the Secretary of State, a certificate is then issued and the request sent to the court. During the extradition hearing the judge must satisfy himself that the request meets the requirements of, among other things, dual criminality and prima facie evidence of guilt, and that the extradition is compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998.

‘Dual criminality’ means that for someone to be extradited, their alleged conduct has to be a criminal offence in both the surrendering and the requesting state. Does the UK have a law that allows such Mickey Mouse criminalisation of “activities detrimental to parliamentary democracy”?

If the court is satisfied that enough information has been supplied, an arrest warrant can be issued. After the extradition hearing and the Secretary of State’s decision, a requested person may appeal to the High Court, and if that is unsuccessful, to the Supreme Court.

Even if the case at the extradition hearing is proven, extradition would still be prohibited if (i) the person could face the death penalty; (ii) there are no speciality arrangements with the requesting country – ‘speciality’ requires that the person must be dealt with in the requesting state only for the offences for which they’re being extradited; (iii) the person had already been extradited to the UK.

Extraditing Clare: A midsummer night’s dream?
August 5, 2015 – FMT


0 Responses to “Extraditing Clare: A midsummer night’s dream?”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

The dawn of A Better Malaysia!
Rafidah Aziz, Hannah Yeoh, Ambiga at TTDI ceramah


Mahathir in Putrajaya ceramah


What happened to 1MDB’s money? – CNBC Video
Nuclear lessons for Malaysia (Part 1) (Part 2)
BN govt is directing attention to distant past and distant future, in order to distract people from present misdeeds and poor governance
Felda - A picture is worth a thousand words
How the 1MDB Scandal Spread Across the World (WSJ)
We cannot afford ridiculously expensive RM55 Billion ECRL!
All that is necessary
for the triumph of evil
is for good men
to do nothing.

- Edmund Burke
When the people
fears their government,
there is TYRANNY;
when the government
fears the people,
there is LIBERTY.

- Thomas Jefferson
Do you hear the people sing?



%d bloggers like this: