06
Mar
16

Bar: AG’s move to clear PM ‘unsustainable in law’

Bar: AG’s move to clear PM ‘unsustainable in law’

Malaysian Bar president Steven Thiru has described attorney-general Mohamed Apandi Ali’s move to clear Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak of any wrongdoing as “unsustainable in law”.

This is in relation to the investigations into US$681 million (RM2.6 billion) deposited into Najib’s personal bank accounts as well as further deposits from state-owned SRC International.

“The decision of the attorney-general to exonerate the prime minister of any criminal offence appears to be unsustainable in law.

“The decision seems premature, lacking in facts, bereft of particulars, and founded on questionable or inadequate reasons,” Thiru said in a statement this evening.

Apandi on Jan 25 cleared Najib of any wrongdoing after the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) submitted three investigation papers on the matter.

The MACC is appealing the attorney-general’s decision after having referred it to the commission’s review panel.

Najib has denied wrongdoing and claimed the deposits in his personal bank accounts were a “donation”.

Thiru pointed out that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) had asked Apandi to request for documents and statements from individuals and several financial institutions under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 2002.

“This is necessary to ascertain the veracity of the evidence that MACC has already collated in Malaysia. Without this elementary scrutiny of the obtained evidence, the investigation would be incomplete.

“However, the attorney-general has refused to make the request, on the basis that he has discovered no criminal offence in relation to the purported donation,” said Thiru.

He said the attorney-general’s refusal to facilitate MACC’s investigation and instead moving to clear Najib has left several basic questions unanswered.

He added that Apandi’s revelation when clearing Najib that US$620 million of the money was “returned” to the donor had only raised more questions.

Among them are:

1) Who specifically donated the US$681 million to Najib between March 22 and April 10, 2013?

2) What was the purpose of the “donation”?

3) If purpose is not identified, is it proper to conclude no criminal offence was committed?

4) Was Bank Negara or MACC notified of the repatriation of US$620 million?

5) What happened to the balance US$61 million?

6) If the manner in which the US$61 million was utilised by Najib has not been ascertained, how can corruption be ruled out?

7) What is the exact sum transferred from SRC International to Najib’s accounts as there were reports of RM41 million followed by another RM27 million.

8) Who gave the approval for the SRC International transfers into Najib’s bank accounts, what was the purpose and how was the account numbers obtained?

Thiru noted that in the case of the SRC International transfers, Apandi had cleared Najib by claiming the prime minister had no knowledge of them and was under the impression that they were all part of the US$681 million donation.

‘Implausible finding’

“However, an account holder is deemed to know, and cannot claim to be unaware, of transactions concerning his personal bank accounts. Knowledge can be implied or inferred in certain circumstances.

“The attorney-general further stated that the evidence shows that the prime minister believed that ‘all payments which were made by him were made from the donation received from the Saudi royal family which was earlier transferred to his personal accounts’.

“This finding appears implausible, as RM27 million from SRC was reportedly transferred into the prime minister’s personal bank accounts on July 8, 2014, which was after the balance of US$620 million of the purported donation had been returned in August 2013,” he said.

Thiru pointed out that Najib had also reportedly paid RM3.2 million in credit card debt from one of the accounts that received the SRC International funds.

“In the circumstances, the attorney-general’s decision that no criminal offences have been committed in respect of MACC’s investigation papers is hasty and difficult to justify.

…more
Bar: AG’s move to clear PM ‘unsustainable in law’
3 Feb 2016

Advertisements

0 Responses to “Bar: AG’s move to clear PM ‘unsustainable in law’”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Nuclear lessons for Malaysia (Part 1) (Part 2)
BN govt is directing attention to distant past and distant future, in order to distract people from present misdeeds and poor governance
Felda - A picture is worth a thousand words
How the 1MDB Scandal Spread Across the World (WSJ)
We cannot afford ridiculously expensive RM55 Billion ECRL!
All that is necessary
for the triumph of evil
is for good men
to do nothing.

- Edmund Burke
When the people
fears their government,
there is TYRANNY;
when the government
fears the people,
there is LIBERTY.

- Thomas Jefferson
Do you hear the people sing?

Archives


%d bloggers like this: