23
May
17

What is behind the termination of Bandar Malaysia deal?

Growing tension at Bandar Malaysia

KUALA LUMPUR (May 20): Tension appears to be brewing among high ranking government officials over the axing of Iskandar Waterfront Holdings Sdn Bhd (IWH) and its partner, China’s state-owned China Railway Engineering Corp Sdn Bhd (CREC) from the RM12.35 billion Bandar Malaysia development project.

The Edge Malaysia, citing a well-placed source, reported in its cover story for the week of May 22-May 28 that a key adviser of the prime minister on the entire IWC CREC debacle is Tan Sri Irwan Serigar Abdullah.

Irwan, who did not reply to calls or messages left by The Edge, has come under fire from certain bloggers while 1Malaysia Development Bhd president Arul Kanda Kandasamy was removed from the board of Bandar Malaysia around the same time as the deal with IWC CREC fell through — sparking talks that Irwan was in a feud with Arul.

Some news portals cited “potential conflicts of interest”, though no elaborations were provided. Sources told The Edge that Arul was with Tan Sri Lim Kang Hoo in China earlier this month at the One Belt One Road Forum, and that Arul had helped to pacify the Chinese government, who were apparently not happy with the failed deal.

For perspective, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, it seemed, was adamant to remove Lim and his vehicle IWH from the development at the weekly Cabinet meeting last Wednesday, despite repeated attempts by government officials to salvage Lim and CREC’s positions in Bandar Malaysia, according to The Edge. “I wonder what Lim did to aggravate the PM to this extent,” an official close to the prime minister told the weekly.

IWC CREC’s Dec 31, 2015 share sale agreement to buy 60% of Bandar Malaysia for RM7.41 billion lapsed after the joint venture failed to meet conditions set, involving 12 payments, despite having been given 12 extensions. But even government officials acknowledged that in such large-scale deals, extensions — even 12 of them — are common, the weekly wrote.

The manner in which the deal was ended was also a topic of conversation. No notice of termination was apparently given to IWH CREC.

Instead, the government issued a public statement on May 3 to say: ““This [termination] is because, despite repeated extensions being granted, IWH CREC failed to meet the payment obligations outlined in the conditions precedent under the share sale agreement (SSA). As a result, the SSA between the parties stands null and void with immediate effect.”

The Chinese, several sources told the weekly, have not taken well to the allegations, and “were especially irrirated with the statement that the consortium was not able to make the payments, as CREC is a state-owned company”.

The weekly wrote, citing sources, that Chinese government officials were even reluctant to accept the refund of the deposit of RM741 million and interim payment of RM44.88 million for the relocation of the air force base, Pangkalan Udara Kuala Lumpur.

They were even upset with Lim for cashing the cheque for the deposit refund. But Lim had other issues to handle, with publicly traded Iskandar Waterfront City Bhd’s (IWC) shares hitting limit down on May 8, after a 92 sen or almost 30% plunge to RM2.16 in early trading, the weekly noted.

On top of that, another Chinese company, Dalian Wanda Group, owned by China’s second richest man, Wang Jianlin (he was overtaken by Alibaba Group’s Jack Ma on May 14), was tipped to come into Bandar Malaysia, replacing IWH CREC.

However, talk of Wanda coming in has died down. The Edge heard that the Chinese authorities were not too pleased with Wang for what seemed like a sabotage of state-owned CREC’s deal, and IWH CREC were said to be back in the picture.

A local daily, linked to the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition, also reported that “Chinese Prime Minister Li Keqiang told Najib that China hopes the deal on Bandar Malaysia stays unchanged. Najib may have to take the Chinese wishes into consideration,” quoting a government source in Beijing.

…more
Growing tension at Bandar Malaysia
May 20, 2017 – theedgemarkets.com

Advertisements

0 Responses to “What is behind the termination of Bandar Malaysia deal?”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Nuclear lessons for Malaysia (Part 1) (Part 2)
BN govt is directing attention to distant past and distant future, in order to distract people from present misdeeds and poor governance
Felda - A picture is worth a thousand words
How the 1MDB Scandal Spread Across the World (WSJ)
We cannot afford ridiculously expensive RM55 Billion ECRL!
All that is necessary
for the triumph of evil
is for good men
to do nothing.

- Edmund Burke
When the people
fears their government,
there is TYRANNY;
when the government
fears the people,
there is LIBERTY.

- Thomas Jefferson
Do you hear the people sing?

Archives


%d bloggers like this: